https://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webp00Proceedingshttps://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webpProceedings2021-07-22 18:33:582021-07-23 06:03:052021 Keynote 2 Using Systemic Interventions to Humanize the Classroom
https://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webp00Proceedingshttps://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webpProceedings2021-07-22 05:33:162021-07-22 18:54:482021 Paper: Engaging with Educational Research: Five Ideas from the Literature to Improve Student-Faculty Collaboration
https://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webp00Proceedingshttps://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webpProceedings2020-12-20 06:01:562021-07-22 17:35:38Poster: A research project in the first semester
https://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webp00Proceedingshttps://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webpProceedings2020-12-20 06:00:352021-07-22 17:35:46Sustainable anchoring of change processes in the university context
https://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webp00Proceedingshttps://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webpProceedings2020-12-20 05:59:072021-07-22 17:35:55Poster: The Special Mentoring Concept at THM
Greg Auhl,* Denise Wood, and Sally McCarthy, Division of Learning & Teaching, Charles Sturt University, Australia
Abstract
Developing quality
programs in higher education, across international jurisdictions, is becoming
more challenging as a variety of stakeholders demand greater input into
curriculum development processes. These multiple stakeholders include
professional bodies, governments, ‘consumers’ of higher education qualifications
and institutional requirements themselves. This paper will examine what
constitutes quality in program design and how integrating standards can drive
quality program development. It will further describe a process to drive what
the authors describe as both internal (within course/subject) and external
(within program) alignment to intentionally design programs that meet both
quality markers and the requirements of stakeholders.
(NB: In preparing this paper, every attempt has been made to use
internationally recognised terminology. At the authors’ home institution in
Australia, a “course” is a “program/qualification.” Individual units are
designated as “subjects,” which equate in many institutions to “courses,” “units,”
or “modules”).
https://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webp00Proceedingshttps://iutconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/iut-type-banner-vector-object-2026.webpProceedings2020-07-27 08:21:252021-05-08 04:54:51The Development of Quality Programs in Higher Education
2021 Keynote 3: Keynote 3: Trauma-Informed and Crisis Teaching
/in 2021 Keynotes2021 Workshop 1: Let’s Talk about Science
/in 2021 Workshops/Roundtables2021 Papers 1: Assessing affective aspects of learning
/in 2021 Papers2021 Keynote 2 Using Systemic Interventions to Humanize the Classroom
/in 2021 Keynotes2021 Paper: Engaging with Educational Research: Five Ideas from the Literature to Improve Student-Faculty Collaboration
/in 2021 Papers2021 Keynote 1: Embedding Positive Education in University Teaching
/in 2021 KeynotesPoster: A research project in the first semester
/in 2019 ProceedingsRead more
Sustainable anchoring of change processes in the university context
/in 2019 ProceedingsRead more
Poster: The Special Mentoring Concept at THM
/in 2019 ProceedingsRead more
The Development of Quality Programs in Higher Education
/in 2019 ProceedingsGreg Auhl,* Denise Wood, and Sally McCarthy, Division of Learning & Teaching, Charles Sturt University, Australia
Abstract
Developing quality programs in higher education, across international jurisdictions, is becoming more challenging as a variety of stakeholders demand greater input into curriculum development processes. These multiple stakeholders include professional bodies, governments, ‘consumers’ of higher education qualifications and institutional requirements themselves. This paper will examine what constitutes quality in program design and how integrating standards can drive quality program development. It will further describe a process to drive what the authors describe as both internal (within course/subject) and external (within program) alignment to intentionally design programs that meet both quality markers and the requirements of stakeholders.
Keywords: Quality course design; integrated standards; internal/external alignment; intentional design
*Corresponding author. Email: gauhl@csu.edu.au
(NB: In preparing this paper, every attempt has been made to use internationally recognised terminology. At the authors’ home institution in Australia, a “course” is a “program/qualification.” Individual units are designated as “subjects,” which equate in many institutions to “courses,” “units,” or “modules”).
Read more